Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stone Gye's avatar

I never agreed with the idea of forcing us to do things that are traumatising just because it is in the curriculum that was designed for allistic people.

By law, they are meant to make accommodations however, when it is listed as something they have to measure for our competency in the trade, they do not budge.

In essence, we are required to mask at specific points during our training.

As we all know, masking is damaging to our well-being and contributes to high mortality rates of neurodivergent people.

If someone tells me to have a drop of poison or sugar, there is no upside to that for me.

It is similar to counselling.

Why would a counsellor deliberately engage in behaviours that are not native and make them uncomfortable?

This negatively impacts the quality of the session.

I decided before I went into training I would only work with neurodivergent clients.

Expand full comment
Piers's avatar

I don’t think it helps much to be outraged in this situation, but I do think it is useful to point out the things that you have, and if possible to do it in such a way as to suggest these concerns should be addressed going forward.

Particularly this part: “I cannot see how it would be helpful to experience rejection by a group of people that we need to be open with and trust for the next significant period of time. I don’t feel it would improve resilience when there was no support, reflecting or explanation until I asked for one.”

I think with regards to the course that you are enrolled in that you have hit the nail on the head, and asking for consideration of this going forward is entirely inappropriate.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts